|
|

Consistency in nervous systems: trial-to-trial and animal-to-animal
variations in the responses to repeated applications of a sensory
stimulus in Aplysia. (1994).Wu JY, Tsau Y, Hopp HP, Cohen LB, Tang
AC, Falk CX. J Neurosci, Mar;14(3 Pt
1):1366-84
Department of Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510.
What is the internal noise in a nervous system? We studied this
question by determining the trial-to-trial consistency of the neuronal
response in the abdominal ganglion of Aplysia californica. Because our
voltage-sensitive dye recordings detected the spike activity from a
large fraction of the neurons in the ganglion, these results provide a
reasonably complete characterization of the consistency of the
response to a sensory stimulus. The consistency of each neuron was
evaluated by the number and timing of spikes in the response. The
variability in the spike count was described using the coefficient of
variation. The spike count variations follow a Poisson distribution,
indicating that most of these variations were the result of a random
process. For each neuron the reliability of the response to touch was
measured in two ways; both measures indicated a broad distribution of
reliabilities within the neuron population. The time of the maximum
response also varied substantially in some animals. These timing
variations were in part due to random processes and in part due to
systematic effects (changes in activity of many neurons that were
highly correlated). The time course of the activity of individual
neurons was compared with the time course of the gill withdrawal. In
some animals the activity of individual neurons was only poorly
correlated with the behavior; in contrast, the summed activity of
groups of neurons matched the behavior quite well. This implies that
the behavioral output of the system may be a distributed combination
of the activity of many neurons. The differences between animals were
substantially larger than the trial-to-trial differences in one
animal. The responses made by different preparations differed along
many dimensions.
|
|