Christopher K. Butler and Scott Gates
Communal Violence and Property Rights
WORKING PAPER
2010
Abstract
We examine the interactions of non-state actors (specifically pastoralists and farmers) when state
provided property-rights protection (PRP) is neither perfect nor absent. PRP is modeled as potentially
biased towards one interpretation of property rights over another interpretation. Using a contest success
function model, we demonstrate that the following non-monotonic result exists. If a society has a
moderate level of PRP but some degree of bias away from equity, increasing PRP can result in either a
decrease or an increase in total appropriative effort. Thus, simply increasing PRP without addressing
equity issues can increase the level of conflict in the society.
You may download this paper here.
Email me with a comment about this paper: .
|