SPC ED 511: Social Construction of Disability
    Home
    Courses
    Handouts
    Vision
    Vita
    e-mail me
    click here to return to the course home page

    February 24, 2009 (class #6)


    Topic: How disability gets constructed: the power of language (week 1 of 3)

    Class outline:
    Announcements, questions, and quandaries:
    • Watch "There's Something About Mary" by class next week.
    • Your film review is due in two weeks. Don't delay!
    • I strongly recommend that you watch and discuss the film in small groups. However, the paper must be INDIVIDUALLY written. 
    • Keep posting to the wiki.
    Interactive presentation: Where's Trig: An analysis of the use of disability in the 2008 Presidential campaign (PowerPoint available on e-reserves)
    Quick write: Does it matter how disability and people with disability are referred to and talked about? Does language really matter? Why or why not?
    Small group #1: 
    • Identify some assumptions about disability that showed up in your language diary assignments.
    • What were the big things that you learned as a result of this assignment?
    Report out from groups
    Small group #2:
    Consider this essay by Robin Morgan listed on the Women Studies blog: http://unmwomen.blogspot.com/ and discuss what you think of the use of the term "stupid", in light of the purpose of the essay. What reactions do you have?
    Report out from groups
    Choral reading of poem
    Minute paper

    Overheads:

    • PowerPoint - available on ereserves
       
    Handouts:
    • poem (pdf file)
    .
    Reading Questions:
      .
      Note: All of the readings, required and recommended, can be found on electronic reserves at Zimmerman library. Please contact the instructor for the course password.
    .
    Author: Peter (2000)
    1.) The author reiterates Foucault's suggestions that "discourse is a key mechanism in the process of social control" (p. 354). What do you understand this to mean?
    2.) The author discusses four major ideas (introduced on page 355) in this article. Summarize the major points of each section.
    3.) In what ways does the IEP process and IEP document relate to the analysis presented in this article?
    4.) Did you find the author's argument and analysis convincing? Why or why not?
    5.) Now that you've read this article:
    • ...what seem to be some important concepts in this reading?
    • ...what are some new terms for you?
    • ...what new questions do you have?
    .
    Authors: Haller, Dorries, and Rahn (2006)
    1.) Haller, Dorries, and Rahn state that “language has always had power to define cultural groups” (p. 61).  Drawing from your own experiences, what are some examples of the influences language and vocabulary have had on groups you consider yourself to be a member of? 
    2.) What role has language/word choice/vocabulary played in your personal or professional experiences with issues of disability?
    3.) How do the phrases “wheelchair user”, “wheelchair bound”, “confined to a wheelchair” differ in their contributions to the social construction of disability.
    4.) What are some of the major findings of this study and how is this information relevant to your life, both personal and professional?
    5.) Now that you've read this article:
    • ...what seem to be some important concepts in this reading?
    • ...what are some new terms for you?
    • ...what new questions do you have?

    * To view PDF documents, such as the readings on reserve, you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader. Click here to download a free copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader
    .
    Extra Resources:
    Website Links:

       
    • "This site is dedicated to exploring the work of French philosopher and social critic Michel Foucault.": http://www.csun.edu/~hfspc002/foucault.home.html
    .
    Recommended Readings on reserve:
    Bogdan, R. (1980). What does it mean when a person says, "I am not retarded"? Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 15(1), 74-79.
    .
    Brownlow, C., & O’Dell, L. (2006). Constructing an autistic identity: AS voices online. Mental Retardation, 44(5), 315-321.
    .
    Danforth, S., & Navarro, V. (1998). Speech acts: Sampling the social construction of mental retardation in everyday life. Mental Retardation, 36(1), 31-43.
    .
    Finlay, W. M., & Lyons, E. (2005). Rejecting the label: A social constructionist analysis. Mental Retardation, 43(2), 120-134.
    .
    Goggin, G., & Newell, C. (2004). Uniting the nation? Disability, stem cells, and the Australian media. Disability and Society, 19(1), 47-60.

    Recommended Books:
    Ferguson, P. M., Ferguson, D. L., & Taylor, S. J. (Eds.). (1992). Interpreting disability: A qualitative reader. New York: Teachers College Press.
     
    Home
    Courses
    Handouts
    Vision
    Vita
    e-mail me

     
    Return to top
    Julia Scherba de Valenzuela, Ph.D.
    Last updated: February 16, 2009