Title
Trends in Alternative Medicine Use in the United States, 1990-1997:
Results of a Follow-up National Survey.[Article]
Authors
Eisenberg, David M. MD; Davis, Roger B. ScD; Ettner, Susan L. PhD;
Appel, Scott MS; Wilkey, Sonja; Van Rompay, Maria; Kessler, Ronald C.
PhD
Author Affiliations
From the Center for Alternative Medicine Research and Education,
Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Drs
Eisenberg and Davis, Mr Appel, and Mss Wilkey and Van Rompay), and
the Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School (Drs
Ettner and Kessler), Boston, Mass.
Source
JAMA. 280(18):1569-1575, November 11, 1998.
Abstract
Context: A prior national survey documented the high prevalence
and costs of alternative medicine use in the United States in 1990.
Objective: To document trends in alternative medicine use in the
United States between 1990 and 1997.
Design: Nationally representative random household telephone
surveys using comparable key questions were conducted in 1991 and
1997 measuring utilization in 1990 and 1997, respectively.
Participants: A total of 1539 adults in 1991 and 2055 in 1997.
Main Outcomes Measures: Prevalence, estimated costs, and
disclosure of alternative therapies to physicians.
Results:
Use of at least 1 of 16 alternative therapies during the previous
year increased from 33.8% in 1990 to 42.1% in 1997 (P < or=
to.001). The therapies increasing the most included herbal medicine,
massage, megavitamins, self-help groups, folk remedies, energy
healing, and homeopathy. The probability of users visiting an
alternative medicine practitioner increased from 36.3% to 46.3%
(P=.002). In both surveys alternative therapies were used most
frequently for chronic conditions, including back problems, anxiety,
depression, and headaches. There was no significant change in
disclosure rates between the 2 survey years; 39.8% of alternative
therapies were disclosed to physicians in 1990 vs 38.5% in 1997. The
percentage of users paying entirely out-of-pocket for services
provided by alternative medicine practitioners did not change
significantly between 1990 (64.0%) and 1997 (58.3%) (P=.36).
Extrapolations to the US population suggest a 47.3% increase in total
visits to alternative medicine practitioners, from 427 million in
1990 to 629 million in 1997, thereby exceeding total visits to all US
primary care physicians. An estimated 15 million adults in 1997 took
prescription medications concurrently with herbal remedies and/or
high-dose vitamins (18.4% of all prescription users). Estimated
expenditures for alternative medicine professional services increased
45.2% between 1990 and 1997 and were conservatively estimated at
$21.2 billion in 1997, with at least $12.2 billion paid
out-of-pocket. This exceeds the 1997 out-of-pocket expenditures for
all US hospitalizations. Total 1997 out-of-pocket expenditures
relating to alternative therapies were conservatively estimated at
$27.0 billion, which is comparable with the projected 1997
out-of-pocket expenditures for all US physician services.
Conclusions: Alternative medicine use and expenditures increased
substantially between 1990 and 1997, attributable primarily to an
increase in the proportion of the population seeking alternative
therapies, rather than increased visits per patient.
JAMA.1998;280:1569-1575
Back to
"Preliminary Results"