ENG 421  Calendar of Readings & Responsibilities*

Week 1         

 

8/22

  • Syllabus. George Saunders's "Sticks"

 

8/24

  • Familiarize yourself with website for the course:  www.unm.edu/~gmartin & the e-reserve site http://ereserves.unm.edu/courseindex.asp (password:  study421 )

  • Read: Story Guidelines (web handout)

  • Read: Offutt's "The Eleventh Draft"  (e-reserve)

  • Read: Saunders's "Adams" (e)

  • Write:  Reading Response & Revision Analysis #1:  2-3 page Reflection on (1) Your thoughts on "Adams"  (2) Your thoughts on Offutt's essay (3) Your thoughts on your revision process, in general, and the revision process, so far, for the story you will be turning in to workshop.

  • In Class:  Introductions

 

                                                             

 

Week 2

 

8/29

  • Read:  "Reading"  Richard Ford (e)
  • Read:  Saunders's "The Barber's Unhappiness" (e)
  • Read:  Interview with George Saunders (e)
  • Write:  Reading Response & Revision Analysis #2:  2-3 page reflection on (1) Ford's essay (2) one craft aspect of Saunders's story you found compelling (3) thoughts on Saunders's interview (4) one craft aspect in your own draft you want to emphasize, elaborate upon--a craft element that is a key to your own understanding of your story.

 

8/31

  • Read:  John Barth's "Incremental Perturbation:  How to Know Whether You've Got a Plot or Not" (e)
  • Read:  Madison Smartt Bell's "Linear Design" (e) 
  • Write:  Reading Response & Revision Analysis #3:  Plot & The Barthian Analysis
    1. What is your character's unstable, but static ground situation?
    2. What comes along that upsets this static situation and makes it dynamic?  (What is the dramatic vehicle?)
    3. Describe the complication (the specific steps in the rising action.)  Number them.  Barth calls this the “ramp” of the story, moving the conflict up toward the climax.
    4. What happens in the climax of the story?
    5. How does the story resolve?
  • In Class:  Leonardo the Terrible Monster
#s 1 & 2 Story Drafts Due in Class:  13 copies

 

 

 

 

Week 3 

9/5

  • Read:  "An Interview with Jane Smiley"  (e)

  • Read:  "Jane Smiley's "What Stories Teach Their Writers " (e)

  • Write:  Reading Response & Revision Analysis #4: The Autobiographical Impulse & The Interesting Mistake: 2-3 page reflection on (1) Smiley's essay, (2)  Smiley's interview, and (3) the mistakes your protagonists is (or isn't) making in your draft.

The Autobiographical Impulse and the Interesting Mistake

“Most young writers have this experience:  They create characters who are imaginative projections of themselves, minus the flaws.  They put this character into a fictional world, wanting that character to be successful and—to use that word from high school—popular.  They don’t want these imaginative projections of themselves to make any mistakes, wittingly or, even better, unwittingly, or to demonstrate what Aristotle thought was the core of stories, flaws of character that produce intelligent misjudgments for which someone must take the responsibility.  (Young writers want to write stories which these imaginative projections of themselves are “victims of circumstances,” like the people on Oprah.  Other’s are at fault for their problems and they are doing the best they can to overcome these obstacles others are responsible for.)   It’s difficult for fictional characters to acknowledge their mistakes, because then they become definitive.  They are that person who did that thing.  The only people who like to see characters performing such actions are readers.  They love to see characters getting into interesting trouble and defining themselves…  There is such a thing as the poetry of a mistake, and when you say “Mistakes were made,” you deprive an action of its poetry, and you sound like a weasel.  When you say, “I fucked up,” the action retains its meaning, its sordid origin, its obscenity and its poetry.  Poetry is quite compatible with obscenity… Sometimes, if we are writers, we have to try and persuade our characters to do what they’ve only imagined doing.  We have to nudge but not force them toward situations where they will get into interesting trouble, where they will make interesting mistakes that they may (or may not) take responsibility for.  When we allow our characters to make mistakes, we release them from the grip of our own authorial narcissism.  That’s wonderful for them, it’s wonderful for us, but it’s best of all for the story.”

From Charles Baxter’s BURNING DOWN THE HOUSE

 

Questions for your story revision: 

  • What interesting mistakes has your protagonist made?  (Have they made any?) 
  • Are the stakes for these mistakes high?  Is there cost and consequence? 
  • What, in the story, holds the protagonist accountable? 
  • What choices are, before and after, are related to this mistake?  How does this mistake influence the plot, the reversal, the resolution? 
  • How might this mistake be accentuated or deepened?  (How might the cost of this mistake be higher?) 
  • Does this mistake lead to another, or other, greater mistakes?

 

9/7

Note and Warning:  The Oates assignment for Thursday is a LOT of work:  get started over weekend. 

#s 3 & 4 Story Drafts Due in Class:  13 copies

         

 

Week 4

9/12

  • WS 3 & 4 Draft 1
  • In Class:  Mamet on Storytelling & Dumbo

 

9/14

  • Read:  Joyce Carol Oates's "Naked":  (1) Rough Draft  (2) Published version in Witness (magazine) (3) Published version in Heat (story collection) (e)
  • Read: An Interview with Joyce Carol Oates (e)
  • Write:  Reading Response & Revision Analysis #5:  Elimination, Addition & Development: 2-3 page reflection on (1) your thoughts on Oates's interview (2)  Note (a) 5 instances of elimination across the three drafts (b) 5 instances of new additions across the three drafts (c) 5 instances of development (material that was already there but was developed across the three drafts.  (3)  Questions for your revision: 
    • What is the most important elimination in your draft so far? 
    • What is the most important addition? 
    • The most important development? 
    • What still needs to be eliminated? Added?  Developed?

TREADMILL JOURNALS DUE IN CLASS

#s 5 & 6 Story Drafts Due in Class:  13 copies

 

 

 

Week 5

9/19

  • Read:  Stephen Koch's "Working & Reworking" (e)
  • Write:  Reading Response & Revision Analysis #6:  Summaries & Scenarios

Summaries and Scenarios  “No story is really a story until it can be retold.  Paraphrase is one of the most potent instruments of understanding.  What cannot be paraphrased has probably not been understood at all.”   Stephen Koch

(1)  Summarize your first draft (or wherever your first draft is now) in 350 words or less.  (This is about one pretty long paragraph.)  

 

Don’t talk to yourself about the story.  Don’t indulge in fancy meditations about theme and do not theorize.  In other words, don’t write,

“This is a story about a son whose mother leaves a mental hospital to come live with him and his new wife.  It investigates the affect of mental illness on a family."

Instead, stick to the story.  Write:  

“In the summer of 2005, Greg and Christine drive out to visit Greg’s mother, Dolores, at the asylum.  Christine and Dolores have never met before.  At the asylum…” 

Tell your story to yourself in concentrated form.  You’re telling the story  to yourself, so stick to the essentials.  Remember, this is just for you.  Your summary should include the basic ground situation, the major moments of rising action, and the turning point.  The summary is a clear account of what happens in the draft. 

 

(2)  It’s important to understand your first draft, but it’s also important to keep your options open to something very different happening, later, in revision.  Write a what if scenario based on some of the possibilities inherent in your draft.  Like the summary, this should be 350 words or less.  Change the beginning.  Change the ending.  Shift the time frame—focusing on a much shorter, or longer, period of time.  Change the tone.  Change the major events.  Change the protagonist.  What if this was more a daughter—mother story than a bride-to-be—groom-to-be story?  This exercise is about testing possibilities.  Follow the same rules as above about sticking to major events on the plot line.

 

If the most typical problems in early drafts are sketchiness, shallow characterization, undepicted action, and vague description—the summary and scenario should orient you to those places in your draft which you need to pay particular attention.  Are the moments you’ve described in your summary/scenario the moments you’ve dedicated the most attention to in your draft?  A simple summary / scenario is your map for the next draft. 

 

 

9/21

  • WS 5 & 6 Draft 1
  • In Class:  Improbability
#s 7-10 Story Drafts Due in Class:  13 copies

 

  

 

Week 6                                                           

9/26

  • WS 7 &8 Draft 1
  • In Class:  A Story is a Record of Choices

 

9/28

  • WS 9 & 10 Draft 1
#s 11 & 12 Story Drafts Due in Class:  13 copies

 

 

Week 7

10/3

  • WS 11 &12 Draft 1

 

10/5

  • Read:  Tim O'Brien's "The Magic Show" (e)
  • Read:  Sherman Alexie's "What You Pawn I Will Redeem" (e)
  • Write: Reading Response & Revision Analysis #7: Mystery and Character: 2-3 pages on (1) your thoughts about O'Brien's essay (2) mystery in Alexie's story and (3) mystery in your story. 

Tim O'Brien in The Magic Show says that "too often characterization fails precisely because it attempts to characterize.  It narrows; it pins down; it explicates; it solves.  The nasty miser is actually quite sweet ands generous...  A "solved" character ceases to be mysterious... I believe that a successful characterization requires an enhancement of mystery:  not shrinkage, but expansion.

  • Which of your characters are too narrow?  How are they narrow? In what way? 

Revise your characters to make them more complex, more mysterious.  Revise them--in small ways (at the sentence level and description level) and large ways (in the things they say and do--especially in the things they do, their important actions and choices) so that your story leaves the reader wondering.

  • What do you want the reader to wonder about your character, and by extension, the story as a whole? 

Or, to say it another way:  Richard Ford says, "Our imagination loves to be filled with an object or to grasp at anything that is too large for its capacity." 

  • What question does your story raise about living in the world that won't reduce to a simple answer?

  • What is still mysterious to you about your story?  Why?  Write 4 sentences that relate to this sense of mystery, and then insert these sentences in different places in your story.

  

 

 

Week 8

10/10

  • Read: Alice Munro's "Cortez Island" (e)
  • Read: An Interview with Alice Munro (e)
  • Read: Notes on Time Management  (web handout)
  • Write:  Reading Response & Revision Analysis #8: 2-3 page reflection on (1) Time Management in "Cortez Island" (2) your thoughts on Munro's interview, and (3) Time Management in your Draft

Time Management:  Analyze the way time works in your story:

  • Is your story chronological?  Is it non-linear?  Why?
  • Does the time management mirror the way memory works? 
  • Does it follow an essential progression of incidents? 
  • Does it involve backstory?  How many backstories?  Do details from the backstory become relevant in the front story later?  If not, why? 
  • What tense is the story written in?  Why?  
  • What is the relationship in your story between scene and summary?  Are the scenes rendered the most important scenes?  Are the most important moments in your story rendered as scenes?  Are these scenes long enough?  (Do you slow the action down and take your time?  Does the story show its significant action, rather than summarize?  Does the story "reproduce the emotional impact of experience"? (Burroway 74). 
  • Which scenes are most crucial to the story?   Why? 
  •  What is the ratio of scene to summary or exposition, in terms of percentages?  (for example, 60% scene, 40% exposition or summary). 

#s 1-4 Story Drafts Due in Class

                                                                         

10/12

Fall Break

 

Week 9  

10/17

 

10/19

  • WS 3&4 Draft 2
#s 5&6 Story Drafts Due in Class

 

                                                                                            

Week 10

10/24
  • WS 5&6 Draft 2

 

10/26

  • Read:  Richard Ford's "Great Falls" (e)
  • Read:  An Interview with Richard Ford (e)
  • Write:  Reading Response & Revision Analysis #9:  2-3 page reflection on (1) Mixed Motives & Inconsistencies in Great Falls (2) your thoughts on Ford's interview (3) Mixed Motives & Inconsistencies in your draft

Mixed Motives & Heightening Inconsistencies:  Have you ever been asked:  Why did you do that?  And you couldn't honestly, or clearly, anyway, answer the question.  You just did it.  You might be able to come up with several possible explanations, but none of them are clearly more "true" than the other.  Give your characters the same freedom, latitude, inexplicability.  Burroway says that characters are “consistently inconsistent.”  But not all inconsistency is good:  your reader needs to understand those possible explanations.  Too often, your readers don't understand what those possible explanations are. 

  • Come up with five possible explanations for the way your character acted.  Build these possibilities into the story, implicitly and explicitly.  (Maybe use the word "maybe.")  Allow the story's outcome (it's climax and resolution) to be influenced by these possibilities. 

Ask yourself the questions: 

  • What does my character want that is at odds with whatever else she/he wants? 

  • What patterns of thought and behavior work against their primary goal?  

#s 7-10 Story Drafts Due in Class

 

 

Week 11

10/31
  • WS 7&8 Draft 2

 

11/2

  • WS 9&10 Draft 2

TREADMILL JOURNALS DUE IN CLASS

#s 11&12 Story Drafts Due in Class

 

 

Week 12

11/7

  • WS 11&12 Draft 2

 

11/9

  • Read: Tobias Wolff's "Firelight" (e)
  • Read:  An Interview with Tobias Wolff (e)
  • Write: Reading Response & Revision Analysis #10:  Object Lessons.  2-3 page reflection on (1) the use of echoing detail in Firelight (2) echoing detail in your draft (3) your thoughts on Wolff's interview

Object Lessons:  Make a list of important details/objects in the first half of your draft.  Which of these details/objects has unexplored potential for the second half of the story?  For taking the plot in another direction?  Use some aspect of this detail, but in a new and different way, at least twice later in the story. 

#s 1-4 Story Drafts Due in Class

 

 

Week 13

11/14

  • WS 1&2 Draft 3

 

11/17

  • WS 3&4 Draft 3
#s 5&6 Story Drafts Due in Class

 

 

Week 14

11/21

  • WS 5&6 Draft 3
#s7-10 Story Drafts Due in Class

 

11/23

Thanksgiving

 

Week 15

11/28

  • WS 7&8 Draft 3

 

11/30

  • WS 9&10 Draft 3
#s 11&12 Story Drafts Due in Class

 

Week 16

11/5

  • WS 11&12 Draft 3

 

11/7

 

 

Week 17

11/12

Portfolio & Treadmill Journal Due in my office by 5PM

 

 

* Assignments Due on the Date Listed