RECIPROCAL ALTRUISM

 

a)      First proposed to explain cooperation among non-kin

b)      Trivers (1971) credited with first explicit dialogue

 

I.    Definition: Pay cost C today (confer benefit B to recipient today), receive benefit B in the future from recipent (who pays cost C in the future)      (cf. Sahlins reciprocity)       overhead a

 

c)      Problem of reciprocal altruism (RA) is that expected return benefits are usually delayed, which provides an opportunity for cheating, shirking, defecting.

ex: If you help me today, why should I bother helping you in the future?

        brood parasitism

 

II.   Theoretical modeling

The prisoners dilemma and the need for repeated interaction – overhead 1, 2

biologist question: how can you get cooperation from a null state of defection?

Axelrod’s prisoner’s dilemma tournament overhead 3

 

What conditions foster RA (TFT)?

1)      good memory for score-keeping – punish defectors, reward cooperators

2)      “shadow of the future” – relatively long-term interactions with partners

            - perhaps limits the kinds of species where we see evidence for RA

 

Problem:

1)      How to get TFT stable when there are too many defectors?

[kinship, assortative grouping patterns]      

 

III. Examples of RA in nature

1)      vampire bats – blood sharing – overhead 4

2)      impala – allogrooming – overhead 5

3)      predator inspection in sticklebacks and guppies 

 

IV. Examples of RA in humans

1)      Ye’kwana garden labor exchange

2)      Ache food sharing, other hunter-gatherers

a)      cost of food given away; expect sharing when costs low, benefits high

b)      variance in acquisition for game vs plant foods – sharing as a risk reduction strategy,

      40% chance of coming back to camp empty-handed, Hadza – 97% for big game;

      sharing benefits greatest for asynchronously acquired, medium-large packages;

      short-term vs. long-term risk – sickness, illness, day-to-day variation, dependency load

c)      but is sharing generalized or contingent?  context-dependent nature of sharing - forest vs. settlement among Ache, Yora – overheads 8, 9, 10, 11

d)      are there non-food benefits to sharing – mating and offspring survivorship, prestige (value?)

e)      tolerated scrounging?  are poor hunters lazy, have no ability, or what?

      - diminishing returns to consumption

 

Do kin make good reciprocity partners?

 

Do we really defect in one-shot situations and only cooperate when there exist the potential for long-term gains?  experimental economics approach.

I.        Ultimatum Game     -  overheads 12, 13

II.     Public Goods Game      -  overheads 14, 15, 16

 

Are people strictly TFTers or do they have an evolved pro-social psychology?

e.g. Why do people tip in restaurants that they’ll never return to?