Logan: Basic Principles of Learning SELECTIVE ATTENTION An organism perceives only some of the stimuli in the environment at any moment and furthermore, learning is largely restricted to stimuli that are perceived by the organism as being important. Like so many other concepts in Psychology, we are all personally familiar with attention. You have most probably been advised to give a teacher your "undivided attention," and have also probably had your attention distracted from an important assignment by an unusual or unexpected event. It is not surprising that one of the factors that determines the attention-getting value (salience, perspicuity) of a stimulus is its intensity. The importance of attention for learning is that there may be little or no learning about stimulus events that are not noticed. Pavlov reported a relevant phenomenon in the context of classical conditioning. He used as an antecedent stimulus a compound of two stimuli such as a tone and a light with one being more intense than the other. After pairing this compound S with food US to dogs, he tested with each of the stimuli presented separately. Only the more intense of them elicited conditioned salivation, indicating that it had completely OVERSHADOWED the less intense element of the compound. One interpretation of overshadowing is that the organism normally only attends to one stimulus at a time; the more salient one commands the organism's attention and the weaker stimulus simply is not noticed. Pavlov also reported a related phenomenon called BLOCKING. If one of two equally intense stimuli is first used as a CS alone, and then is combined with the second stimulus, all the while the US being given on every trial, the added stimulus fails to develop an association with the US. The original S, having already been conditioned, apparently commands the organism's attention so that the added stimulus is not really noticed. Blocking is like overshadowing except that the stimulus has acquired its attention-getting value. We use the term SELECTIVE ATTENTION when the differential control of behavior among the available stimuli cannot readily be attributed to differences in salience. In addition to blocking, an experimental design demonstrating selective attention is to present one stimulus (say, a light) on every trial with 50% partial reinforcement. This would be perfectly adequate to produce conditioning were it the only stimulus being used. When, however, it is combined with other stimuli (say, two tones) that are more informative about the occurrence of the US, the organism apparently learns to pay attention only to the informative stimulus. Selective attention is not the same as receptor-orienting acts. The latter, as the name implies, means directing one's sensory receptors in such a way as to maximize a source of stimulation, such as when you look at some particular object in the environment. Receptor-orienting acts are peripheral, involving overt turning of the head and eyes, touching an object, putting it to one's tongue, sniffing, and so forth. Selective attention, in contrast, is presumed to be a more central, cognitive process. Many psychologists of a behavioristic persuasion have shunned the notion of selective attention because it seems to imply a homunculus inside the mind scanning all of the sensory stimulation and deciding what to attend to at any moment. This image is something like the television director who sits before a number of TV monitors that show the action from different angles and decides to put first this one and then that one on the air. The problem is that such an image begs the important question of what rules govern the homunculus in deciding which stimuli to bring into focus. Another reason for caution in applying the Principle of Selective Attention is that there is some evidence that learning may proceed quite effectively without our being consciously aware (and hence paying attention) to the controlling events. For example, classical conditioning has been reported with stimuli that are subliminal (below the threshold intensity required for the person to be able to report their occurrence). Nevertheless, it is clear that the number and variety of stimulus energies continually bombarding our senses greatly exceeds the number to which we can attend at any moment in time. The quantitative limitation of our consciousness is sometimes referred to as the CHANNEL CAPACITY, and the presumption is that the irrelevant, redundant, and relatively insignificant information being received by our senses is somehow filtered out, or at least attenuated (reduced) such that the most important information becomes the focus of attention. The notion is that an organism only perceives a small part of the stimulation that is received, that the amount that can be perceived at any instant is limited, and that the organism can, at least to some extent, voluntarily control what is perceived. Attention may be commanded involuntarily by intense and unusual events, but the organism can selectively attend to less salient features of the environment. There is little question that people can selectively attend to particular aspects of the total stimulus environment. If you press the fingernail of one index finger into the palm of the other hand, you will most likely notice the minor pain as your fingernail digs into your palm. However, without changing anything "outside," you can redirect your attention to the pressure that you palm is applying against your finger since those stimuli, while less perspicuous are equally present. Furthermore, selective attention is learnable. You can, for example, improve the skill with which you can attend to stimuli in your peripheral vision; speed reading courses entail learning to take in a wider perception of printed words. Similarly, the study of art and music appreciation involve learning to attend not only to the principal theme of the work, but to less salient but no less interesting features of it. One very important aspect of training in selective attention is learning torecognize when attention is drifting toward a naturally more compelling stimuli. We have all missed parts of a lecture because our thoughts wandered into appealing daydreams without our immediately realizing it. The speaker's words continue to strike our ears, but getting the message requires selective attention. TERMS: Receptor-orienting act, selective attention, blocking, overshadowing, compound stimulus