UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO

FALL SEMESTER 2016

HISTORY 300/012: HISTORY OF FASCISM

 

Thursday, 26 August 2016:

Pinning down that which cannot be pinned down:

Toward a definition of fascism

 

Key Terms: Typology, Marxism, fascism vs. Fascism

 

I.      Typologies (models) of fascism and their problems

II.     Marxist approaches to fascism and their problems

III.   Weberian/Neo-Weberian approaches to fascism

 and their problems

 


 

UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO

FALL SEMESTER 2016

HISTORY 300/012: HISTORY OF FASCISM

 

Tuesday, 30 August 2016:

Fascism’s antecedent: the rise of the Radical Right in the 19th Century

 

Key Terms:  totalitarianism, palengenesis, governmentality (Michel Foucault), ubermensch, Darwinism and Social Darwinism, eugenics, “radical right”

 

I.      Brief recap of approaches to fascism

A.    Marxist, Neo-Weberian and Totalitarian understandings and their problems

        B.    Ultimately fascism is too diverse and

                variegated to define, but that does not mean

                that we can’t say anything at all about it.

II.     Searching for historical origins of fascism

A.    Reformation Intolerance? Enlightenment restructuring of society?

B.    Late 19th Century Revolt against Reason

        1.     Sigmund Freud and Friedrich Nietzsche

2.     Crowd Psychology and Violence: Gustave LeBon and Georges Sorel

3.     Charles Darwin, Social Darwinism, and the Rise of Racialist Thinking

III.   If we really want to understand fascism, we must

        explore the CONTEXT of the late 19th Century and

        the rise of the radical right

A.    The frustrated pseudo-scientists and Professionals shut out of academies who enter politics

B.    What the “radical right” fought for/against:

        1.     The definition of the nation

        2.     Racial inclusivity

        3.     Feminism


 

UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO

FALL SEMESTER 2016

HISTORY 300/012: HISTORY OF FASCISM

 

Thursday, 30 September 2016:

The rise of the Radical Right in the 19th Century:

The Case Study of France

 

Key Terms:  “radical right”, Boulanger (Boulangerists), Dreyfus Affair, Maurice Barrès, Charles Maurras, Action Française (founded 1899),

 

I.      If we really want to understand fascism, we must

        explore the CONTEXT of the late 19th Century and

        the rise of the radical right

A.    The frustrated pseudo-scientists and Professionals shut out of academies who enter politics

B.    What the “radical right” fought for/against:

        1.     The definition of the nation

        2.     Racial inclusivity

        3.     Feminism

II.     A Case Study of the Radical Right: France

        A.    The Politics of the Third Republic 

                1.     The Boulanger Affair (1889)

                2.     The Dreyfus Affair (1894-1906)

        B.    The French Radical Right

                1.     Barrès and the Patriotic League

                2.     Maurras and Action Française

C.     Summary. The French Radical Right results from the meeting of 4 tendencies:

·                       1) Royalists and Catholics marginalized and radicalized by successive defeats at the hands of republicans

·       2) Catholic populists desperate to resist secularization and capture leadership of the proletariat from the socialists

·       3) Nationalists annoyed by the government’s apparent lack of interest in revenge against Germany

·       4) The nationalist and populist wing of socialism, of which Barrès tried to capture the leadership.


 

UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO

FALL SEMESTER 2016

HISTORY 300/012: HISTORY OF FASCISM

 

 

Tuesday, 6 September:

Authoritarian Nationalism before WW1, continued

 

Key Terms:  ANI (Italian Nationalist Association), Volkish culture and ideology, German Landowners’ League, Pan-German league, Union of the Russian People (Black Hundreds),

 

I.       Review of the French Radical Right

II.      Other examples of the Rise of Authoritarianisms and Authoritarian Nationalisms

A.               Italy:  Alfredo Rocco and the Italian Nationalist Association (ANI)

B.               Authoritarianism, racism, and anti-Semitism in Germany

C.                Russia and the Black Hundreds

D.               British conservatives and the fear of the disintegration of the UK

III.     THE GREAT WAR, THE RESULTANT PEACE TREATISES, AND THE ECONOMIC DIFFICULTIES OF THE INTERWAR YEARS FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGED THE WHOLE SITUATION.

 


 

UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO 

FALL SEMESTER 2016

HISTORY 300/012: HISTORY OF FASCISM

 

 

Thursday, 8 September 2016:

World War I and its Aftermath

 

What made this war so particularly terrible for the military combatants as well as civilians back on the home front?  How did this trauma inform the bourgeoning fascist or pre-fascists movements of Europe):

 

1)                The experience of the war created an alternative national, and radicalized culture that was often hostile to the governments responsible for the War and its aftermath.

2)                The early jingoistic enthusiasm for the War made the unfolding of the war particularly painful and disillusioning.

3)                The experience of the war, specifically the protracted trench warfare, seemed to prove folks like Nietzsche and Freud were right and that Western Civilization was not the be all end all positivist/rationalist community.

4)                One of the effects of the strong interventionist state including that in the West, where liberal democracies had to suspend civil liberties, was to condition populations into seeing authoritarianism as an efficacious and viable form of rule

5)                Among other things, the lost generation of young men who died in the War created a political vacuum for figures like Mussolini and Hitler to ascend to positions of political power.

6)                Especially for Germany and Italy, the Treaty of Versailles (1919) was a source of tremendous national pain, dishonor, embarrassment, which would fuel ultranationalist and fascist hopes for revenge and/or rebirth for their nations.


 

UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FALL 2016

HISTORY 300/012:  HISTORY OF FASCISM

 

Prof. E.A. Sanabria

 

Tuesday, 13 September 2016:

The Origins of Italian Fascism

 

Alert:  Office Hours tomorrow will be from 9:45AM to 11:15AM

 

Key Terms: Trasformismo, Battle of Caporetto, Ethiopian War (1895-6), Benito Mussolini, Futurists, Fasci Italiano di Combattimento, “Black Shirts” (squadristi), Gabrieli D’Annunzio

 

I.                   Unfinished business from my missed lecture

A. Discussing Paper Assignment due 27 September 2016

B.  Summarizing World War I and it’s Trauma on Europe in the early 20th Century

II.                 United Italy (1861) and its problems

A.                Marquis d’Azeglio:  “Now that we have built Italy it is necessary to make Italians”

B.                The Catholic Church as Obstacle to Nation-Building

C.                Trasformismo and the contribution to general apathy and cynicism for Italian Liberalism

D.               The Humiliation of the Ethiopian campaign and the Battle of Edowa or Adwa (1 March 1896)

E.                 Italy and World War I:  a society divided between interventionists and neutralists

III.              Benito Mussolini, his early years

A.                Troubled childhood

B.                Dodges draft and embraces socialism in Switzerland

C.                World War I, his about face, and his outser from Italian Socialism

IV.             Ingredients for the First Fascism

A.                Revolutionary syndicalists

B.                The Futurists

C.                1919 and the Fasci Italiano di Combattimento

V.                Post World War I Chaos

A.                The Biennio Rosso and Socialist Agitation

B.                The Squadristi (Black Shirt’s and Fascism’s response)

C.                D’Annunzio and Fiume (1919-1920)

 

 


 

UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FALL 2016

HISTORY 300/005:  HISTORY OF FASCISM

 

Prof. E.A. Sanabria

 

Thursday, 15 September 2016:

The Fascist Seizure of Power

 

Key Terms:  Biennio Rosso, squadristi, Gabriele D’Annunzio, Fiume, ras, March on Rome (28-29 October 1922), PNF (National Fascist Party), MVSN (National Security Volunteer Militia), Acerbo Law (July 1923), Giacomo Matteotti

 

Announcement:  Gil Garceti talk today, Pearl Auditorium, 5PM

 

I.       I want us to understand that Fascism grew and changed significantly between the original ideas of the Fasci di combattimento and the Platform of the PNF. How and why did this occur?

          A.      What did Fiume and D’Annunzio expose?     

          B.      Which groupings within “Fascism” did Mussolini have to navigate through as he moved toward becoming Dictator?

II.      From Mussolini’s Premiership to his Dictatorship

A.               Strong numbers, but poor election results in 1921… the founding of the PNF (November 1921)

B.               The Ras, the March on Rome (28 October 1922), and Mussolini’s Premiership (begins 29 October 1922).

C.                The Fascist Grand Council, the MVSN, and the hierarchy pointing to Mussolini

D.               The April 1924 elections and the Fascsist landslide

E.                The Matteotti Crisi

 

 

UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FALL 2016

HISTORY 300/005:  HISTORY OF FASCISM

 

Prof. E.A. Sanabria

 

Tuesday, 20 September 2016:

Fascism in Power

 

Key Terms:  MVSN (National Security Volunteer Militia), Acerbo Law (July 1923), Giacomo Matteotti, Lateran Pact (1929…see Stone, ed. Doc. 12),

 

I.       Understanding the stakes involved with the March on Rome

A.      Mussolini, the Ras, the Blackshirts are not monolithic in vision/goals

B.      Liberals (who aren’t very liberal) and elites caught between rock and hard place (why do they side with Fascists?)

II.      Italian politics, 1922-1925

A.               The Fascist Grand Council, the MVSN, and the hierarchy pointing to Mussolini

B.               The April 1924 elections and the Fascsist landslide

C.                The Matteotti Crisis

III.     Features of the Fascist Totalitarian(ish) State

          A.      Non-Competitive Political Nature

                   1.      Bans opposition

                   2.      Censorship and Freedom of the Press

                   3.      Supervision/Oversight

                   4.      Bans local elections

          B.      Fascism and the Catholic Church

                   1.      From antagonism to the Lateran Pacts

                   2.      Effects of Church/State reunion

 

 

UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FALL 2016

HISTORY 300/005:  HISTORY OF FASCISM

 

Prof. E.A. Sanabria

 

Thursday, 22 September 2016:

Fascism in Power, Part II

 

Key Terms:  Opera Nazionale Dopolavoro (National Recreation or Afterwork Organization), Opera Nazionale ed Maternita ed Infanzia (ONMI), Fasci Femenelli

 

I.                  The Fascist Society, Economy, and Culture

A. Labor and the Corporatist State

B. Fascist Art and Aesthetics   

II.               World War I, the interwar period, and the New Woman in Italy

A.               Men at the Front, Women working at home front

B.               Gender Crisis:  The “New Woman” and her fashion and behavior

C.                Italian Women and Fascism

III.            Discussion:  How fascism appealed to women, and was the appeal effective?

 


 

UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FALL 2016

HISTORY 300/005:  HISTORY OF FASCISM

 

Prof. E.A. Sanabria

 

Tuesday, 27 September 2016:

Contextualizing the Rise of Nazism

 

Key Terms: Weimar Republic (1918-1933), Friekorps,

 

I.   Sketching out the “soup” from which Nazism arose in Wilhelmine Germany:

A.                Excitement for World War I and subsequent disillusionment through scenes from Louis Milestone’s All Quiet on the Western Front (1930) based on the novel by Erich Maria Remarque

B.                Völkisch nationalism and whether we can draw a straight line from it to Nazism

C.                Aryanism and the new Anti-Semitism

II.       The Aftermath and Humiliation of the War and the Treaty of Versailles

          A.      The unpopular Republic

B.      Punitive terms for Germany (reparations, reduction of military resources, etc.)

 


 

UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FALL 2016

HISTORY 300/005:  HISTORY OF FASCISM

 

Prof. E.A. Sanabria

 

Thursday, 29 September 2016:

The Nazi Conquest of State

 

Key Terms: Wolfgang Kapp, Adolph Hitler (1889-1945), German Workers Party (DAP later NASDP or Nazis), National Socialist German Workers Party (NASDP the Nazis), The S.A. (Sturmabteilung or Storm Troopers), Beer Hall Putsch in Munich (8-9 November 1923)

 

I.       The troubled Republic and Wolfgang Kapp’s coup attempt in March 1920

II.       Adolph Hitler and the NASDP’s attempted coup in November 1923

          A.      Important results

          B.      Why did Hitler fail in 1923 but not in 1933?

III.      Discussion:  What was appealing Germans in 1930 to Nazism?

 


 

UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FALL 2016

HISTORY 300/005:  HISTORY OF FASCISM

 

Prof. E.A. Sanabria

 

Tuesday, 4 October 2016

The Conquest of State, continued

 

Key Terms:  Schutzstaffel (S.S. or Defense Force), Heinrich Himmler, Marshall Paul von Hindenburg, Enabling Act, Gleischaltung, Gestapo

 

I.                   Nazism’s growth in the Aftermath of the Great Depression

A.                The Party of the Young and Vital

B.                Himmler’s elite SS

II.                 The Nazi Seizure of Power, 1930-33

A.                President Hindenburg’s abuse of his political powers

B.                Extraordinary Nazi electioneering/campaigning techniques

C.                Spring 1932 elections:  Nazis win 230 seats but Papen dissolves the Parliament; Fall 1932: Nazis win 196 seats

D.               30 Jan 1933:  Hitler is made Chancellor

III.              The Nazi State

A.                Hermann Göring is named Minister of Interior, purges police and legitimates the SA and SA Terror.

B.                27 February 1933:  Reichstag fire blamed on Communists

C.                23 March 1933:  Enabling Act

D.               Hitler purges the SA on the Knight of the Long Knives, 30 June 1934

E.                 Implementing Gleischaltung

 

 

 

UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FALL 2016

HISTORY 300/005:  HISTORY OF FASCISM

 

Prof. E.A. Sanabria

 

Thursday, 6 October 2016:

The Nazis, Women, and the Racial State

 

Key Words:  Kinder, Küche, Kirche (Children, Kitchen, Church); Gertrud Scholtz-Klink, Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring (July 1933)

 

I.                   Implementing Gleischaltung beyond 1933

A. Revisit Claire Hall’s piece on the Gestapo and how totalitarian social control looks like

II.                 Women and the Nazi State

A.                Hitler’s and the Nazis’ anti-feminism

B.                Efforts to drive back working women into the home an grow the population

III.              Nazi racialist ideologies and policies

A.                Growing the Master Aryan Race

B.                July 1933:  Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring

 


 

UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FALL 2016

HISTORY 300/005:  HISTORY OF FASCISM

 

Prof. E.A. Sanabria

 

Tuesday, 18 October 2016:

On the Diffusion of Fascism and Nazism in Interwar Europe

 

Key Terms: Corneliu Codreanu, Iron Guard (Legion of the Archangel Michael), Croix de Feu, Oswald Mosely, British Union of Fascists (1932),

 

I.        Example of the diffusion of Fascism/Nazism #1: Romania

A.      WWI Victor rewarded with expansion but with various minorities (Germans, Hungarians, Jews)

B.      Anti-Semitic youth, university students, and professionals

C.      Interesting story of Codreanu, his arrest (1924) and acquittal (1925).

D.      The Iron Guard:  more than imitators of Nazis

II.       Fascism in the Inter-War democracies

          A.       Mussolini’s efforts for a Fascist International

B.      Rivalry between Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany until about 1936

C.      The rise of some fascist groups and movements that weren’t particularly fascist (like the Jeunesses patriotes in France) and non-fascists groups that were fascist (such as the Croix de Feu)

D.      Fascism in Britain?

1.      Context: breakdown of empire and economic stagnation

2.      British Union of Fascists

3.      Why fascism fails in Britain


 

UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FALL 2016

HISTORY 300/005:  HISTORY OF FASCISM

 

Prof. E.A. Sanabria

 

Thursday, 20 October 2016:

The Diffusion of Fascism/Nazism, continued

 

Key Words:  American-German Bund, Fr. Charles Coughlin (National Union for Social Justice), Austrian Home Guard (Heimwehr)

 

Announcement:  Snead-Wertheim Lecture: Jason Smith presents "The New Deal as Development: Exporting Capitalism to the Postwar World"

Event

When: Oct 20, 2016 - 03:00pm - Oct 20, 2016 - 05:00pm

Where: History Department Common Room, Mesa Vista Hall 1104

Dr. Jason Scott Smith, winner of the 2015-2016 Snead-Wertheim Endowed Lectureship in History and Anthropology,  will give a talk on "The New Deal as Development: Exporting Capitalism to the Postwar World" on Thursday, October 20, 2016 from 3:00-5:00 in the History Department Common Room.

 

 

I.        Fascism in the USA?

          A.      The revival of the KKK (2 to 8 Million in 1920s)

B.      German-American Bund and Fr. Coughlin’s National Union for Social Justice

II.       What does the appearance but apparent failure of fascism say in crisis-ridden Britain, France, and the USA say about fascism?

III.      Fascism in Eastern Europe:  In Eastern Europe, post-war politics usually meant dictatorship of a majority, NOT toleration nor multiculturalism

          A.      How come no fascism in Czechoslovakia?

          B.      Dictatorships that create mass parties (Poland and Yugoslavia)

          C.      Semi-Authoritarian Hungary under Miklos Horthy and pro-Nazis like the Iron Cross.

 

 

 


 

UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FALL 2016

HISTORY 300/005:  HISTORY OF FASCISM

 

Prof. E.A. Sanabria

 

Tuesday, 25 October 2016:

The Case of Interwar Iberia

 

Key Terms:  caciquismo, Battle of Annual (Morocco, 1921), Miguel Antonio Primo de Rivera, Patriotic Union (Unión Pátriotica)

 

I.      Inter-war Eastern Europe as the site of experimentation with fascism and authoritarianism 

        A.    Pay special attention to Payne’s chapters on Eastern Europe as they show the difficulty in generalizing/categorizing fascism:

1) Competing forms of fascism within a country         *(see Austro-Nazis versus Austro-Fascists in

Austria)

2) Romania: example of Iron Cross at odds with

conservative authoritarian state

II.     Iberia before the Spanish Civil War

A.    19th Century Spain and Portugal and a troubled relationship with Liberalism/Constitutional

        Monarchy

B.    World War I: Spain neutral; Portugal with the Allies (though they perform poorly)

C.     The Breakdown of the Restoration Regime in Spain

        a.     Despite neutrality, Spain sees the same class antagonism as the Rest of Europe

        b.    Crisis of confidence after Annual 1921

III.   Primo de Rivera Dicatorship, 1923-1929/30

        A.    How fascists? How not?

B.    Ben-Ami’s assessment:  Primo paved the way for Franco

 


 

HISTORY 300/005:  HISTORY OF FASCISM

 

Prof. E.A. Sanabria

 

Thursday, 27 October 2016:

The Spanish Civil War and the Iberian

Dictatorships

 

Key Terms:  Falange Española, José Antonio Primo de Rivera, General Francisco Franco, Spanish Civil War, 1936-1939, Antonio Salazar, Estado Novo

 

I.      Spain’s Second Republic, 1931-1936

        A.    Radical Biennium

        B.    “Black” Biennium, 1933-1935

II.     The Spanish Civil War (July 1936-Feb 1939)

        A.    Franco’s Coup attempt

B.    Foreign Intervention: Spain as the “Pregame” to WWII

C.     Spanish Fascism:  Jose Antonio’s Falange

III.   The Franco Dictatorship, 1939-1975

        A.    The juggling of the political “Families”

        B.    Making everyone “fascist”

        C.     Violence, Stability, and order

IV.   The Salazar Estado Novo in Portugal, 1926-1968


 

HISTORY 300/005:  HISTORY OF FASCISM

 

Prof. E.A. Sanabria

 

Tuesday, 2 November 2016:

Fascism and Nazism in Race

 

Key Terms:  Einzatsgruppen, Final Solutions (1942)

 

I.      Fascism and Nazism were both racist, but Fascism

        was not racist in the manner Naziism was

        A.    What do we mean by an “anti-racist”?

        B.    Biological racism

        C.     Cultural racism (Assimilationism)

II.     Nazi Racism and Anti-Semitism

A.    Critics see Nazi racism tied to achieve other goals

        1.     Marxists see antisemitism as a way capitalist dupe workers

        2.     Weberians focus on the Jew as symbol of hated modernity

B.    Nazis saw race as primary mover in world (Biological)

C.     Goals behind Nazi racism/anti-Semitism

D.    Milestones in Nazi persecution of Jews and others

III.   Fascism, racism, and the nation

A.    Not initially wedded to racism (Mussolini more concerned with international fascism)

B.    Fascist Italy’s racism laws (late 1930s) result from rapprochement with Nazis

C.     Many Italians helped Jews escape rather than comply with Final solution


 

HISTORY 300/005:  HISTORY OF FASCISM

 

Prof. E.A. Sanabria

 

Thursday, 4 November 2016:

The milieu of Anti-semitism/racism in

World War II Eastern Europe

 

Key Term:  Jedwabne, 9-10 November 1941,

 

I.      An open discussion on Jan T. Gross’s Neighbors

        *      Items to consider include: 

·      Why does Gross emphasize the label neighbors to the victims and perpetrators of the pogram?

·      Polish reception to the 2001 publication? Difficulty of reconciling the “Poles as victims” discourse…

·      Pg. 47: would the massacre have occurred without the Nazis? Does that implicate the Nazis for blame/responsibility?

·      Why did Jedwabne residents kill 1600 Jews? Why did others not do anything to stop the massacre? What could have been done

·      What does “Holocaust” mean given the context of Jedwabne NOT being with the constraints or limits of Germany or German controlled space (like Dacau, Auschwitz, etc.)


 

HISTORY 300/005:  HISTORY OF FASCISM

 

Prof. E.A. Sanabria

 

Tuesday, Thursday, 8 and 10 November 2016 and Tuesday, 15 November 2016:

Nazism, Fascism, fascism, and World War II

 

Key Terms:  Luftwaffe, Rome-Berlin Axis, Anschluss, Appeasement, Neville Chamberlain, Molotov-Ribbentrop Treaty (Aug. 23, 1939), Vichy France, Marshall Pétain, Pierre Laval.

 

I.       Introduction: fascism’s association with World War II

A.      fascism responsible for the war, specifically Hitler and the Nazis in 1939

B.      Nazi Germany came to control almost all of Europe

II.      Remembering what about fascism made it have a predilection to War

III.     The path to Hitler’s War

          A.      Provocations:  Withdrawal from League of Nations in 1933; Non-Aggression Pact with Poland in 1934; attempted Nazi coup in Austria in 1934; conscription and building up of the Luftwaffe (1935); Saar plebiscite (January 1935); reoccupation of Rhineland (March 1936)

          B.      Let’s not forget Mussolini too:  Invasion of Ethiopia (1935); Joins Hitler and Nazi German support of Franco in the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939); Rome-Berlin Axis (July 1936); allows Hitler Austria in 1938.

IV.     The Munich Crisis:  The Climax of Appeasement

          A.      Annexation (Anschluss) of Austria (March 1938)

          B.      Hitler’s sights on Czechoslovakia

                   1.      Setting the groundwork

2.      Chamberlain, Daladier, Hitler and Mussolini meet in September 1938

3.      Czechoslovakia forced to sign its death warrant

V.      End of Appeasement

A.      Molotov-Ribbentrop Treaty of Non-Aggression between Germany and the Soviet Union

B.      Germans Invade Poland on September 1, 1939 to touch off the War (The Soviet Union invades Poland from the East too)

VI.     Years of Axis Triumph, 1939-1942

A.      German and Soviet campaigns in Scandinavia (Spring of 1940)

B.      May 10, 1940:  Germany marches into Netherlands, Belgium, Luxemborg, and France

C.      Establishment of Vichy France, Summer 1940.

 

 

 


 

HISTORY 300/012:  HISTORY OF FASCISM

 

Prof. E.A. Sanabria

 

Thursday, 17 November 2016:

(f)ascism, Women, and Class

 

Key Terms:  Pilar Primo de Rivera, Sección Femenina (Spain), National Socialist Frauenschaft (NSF),

 

I.      The fascists’ paradox:  the imagined community of

        the masses, bunches amidst the fact that it never

        occurred to them that classes and genders would

        disappear.

II.     (f)ascism and masculinity

        A.    Gendered nationalism

B.    Homosexuality, Homoeroticism, and Homophobia (the Case of Ernst Röhm)

III.   Another fascists’ paradox:  although fascists wanted women to remain in the home, they politicized the domestic

        A.    Feminisms (yes, plural) and fascist anti-feminism

B.    Women, wives, and mothers in the service of the state

IV.   Fascism and class: the reintegration of workers to the national community required the elimination of political influences and identities

        A.    Corportatism and its open questions

        B.    Fascism and Business/Capitalism


 

Tuesday, 29 November 2016

Cuadra, Nathan                                                K. D. Bracher, The German Dictatorship

Hererra, Anthony                                            S. Bachrach & S. Leukert, State of Deception

Horner, Lucas                                                    F. Fischer, From Kaiserreich to Third Reich

Hurst, Kaymon                                                  S. Kuhl, The Nazi Connection: Eugenics, American Racism …

Livingood, Justin                                               C. Koonz, The Nazi Conscience

López, Kevin                                                      G.W. Blackburn, Education in the Third Reich

Pelligrino, Spencer                                          R. Rosenbaum, Explaining Hitler

Trujillo-Bustos, Camela                                  E.D. Heineman, What difference does a Husband Make?

Valdez, Victor                                                    R. Burden, The Nuremburg Party Rallies

 

Thursday, 1 December 2016

Baca, Arika                                                          A. Cazorla, Fear and Progress (in Franco’s Spain)

Begay, Summer                                                                M.J. Meskill, Hitler and Japan

Danaher, Greg                                                  H. Rousso, The Vichy Syndrome

Farnham, Thomas                                            M. Mazower, Inside Hitler’s Greece

Hausman, Joe                                                    T. Redman, Ezra Pound and Italian Fascism

Magenis, Feena                                                                C. Cross, The Fascists in Britain

Morris, Molly                                                     E. Paulicelli , Fashion under Fascism

Paul, Richard                                                      R. Paxton, Vichy France

 

Tuesday, 6 December 2016

Hubbard, Vaughn                                            D. King, Lyndon LaRouche and the New American Fascism

Jackson, Jasmyn                                               J. Stephenson, Women in Nazi Germany

Marquez, Michael                                           R.J. Alexander, The Perón Era

Morse, Erin                                                         S. Candey, American Nazis

Szabat, Daniel                                                    N. McClean, Behind the Mask of Chivalry

 


 

HISTORY 300/012:  HISTORY OF FASCISM

 

Prof. E.A. Sanabria

 

Thursday, 8 December 2016:

The Aftermath of fascism

 

Key Terms:  Italian Social Movement (MSI), Jean-Marie Le Pen, National Front (NF), Vladimir Zhirinovsky, Liberal Democratic Party of Russia, Vladimir Putin,  

 

I.       Introduction: There is no denying the appearance of modern,

 contemporaneous manifestations of groupings inspired by

Fascism and Nazism

II.      Some Case Studies

          A.      The Italian MSI: Post-war neo-Fascist, merges at first with

most far-right elements of the Christian Democrats, then

 with Berlusconi’s party as Alleanza Nationale

          B.      Le Pen’s NF in France: loving democracy but hating

democratic tolerance and plurality in preference to the

True France

          C.      Russia and Communist fascism?

III.     The modern far-right’s boogeyman is not that far off from the

          interwar fascist boogeyman:  Modernity (Globalization) and the

          Other (immigrants, foreigners, etc.)

IV.     What do we do now?

 


 

Americans are no wiser than the Europeans who saw democracy yield to fascism, Nazism, or communism. Our one advantage is that we might learn from their experience. Now is a good time to do so. Here are twenty lessons from the twentieth century, adapted to the circumstances of today.


1. Do not obey in advance. Much of the power of authoritarianism is freely given. In times like these, individuals think ahead about what a more repressive government will want, and then start to do it without being asked. You've already done this, haven't you? Stop. Anticipatory obedience teaches authorities what is possible and accelerates unfreedom.
 


2. Defend an institution. Follow the courts or the media, or a court or a newspaper. Do not speak of "our institutions" unless you are making them yours by acting on their behalf. Institutions don't protect themselves. They go down like dominoes unless each is defended from the beginning.
 


3. Recall professional ethics. When the leaders of state set a negative example, professional commitments to just practice become much more important. It is hard to break a rule-of-law state without lawyers, and it is hard to have show trials without judges.
 


4. When listening to politicians, distinguish certain words. Look out for the expansive use of "terrorism" and "extremism." Be alive to the fatal notions of "exception" and "emergency." Be angry about the treacherous use of patriotic vocabulary.
 


5. Be calm when the unthinkable arrives. When the terrorist attack comes, remember that all authoritarians at all times either await or plan such events in order to consolidate power. Think of the Reichstag fire. The sudden disaster that requires the end of the balance of power, the end of opposition parties, and so on, is the oldest trick in the Hitlerian book. Don't fall for it.


6. Be kind to our language. Avoid pronouncing the phrases everyone else does. Think up your own way of speaking, even if only to convey that thing you think everyone is saying. (Don't use the internet before bed. Charge your gadgets away from your bedroom, and read.) What to read? Perhaps "The Power of the Powerless" by Václav Havel, 1984 by George Orwell, The Captive Mind by Czesław Milosz, The Rebel by Albert Camus, The Origins of Totalitarianism by Hannah Arendt, or Nothing is True and Everything is Possible by Peter Pomerantsev.
 


7. Stand out. Someone has to. It is easy, in words and deeds, to follow along. It can feel strange to do or say something different. But without that unease, there is no freedom. And the moment you set an example, the spell of the status quo is broken, and others will follow.
 


8. Believe in truth. To abandon facts is to abandon freedom. If nothing is true, then no one can criticize power, because there is no basis upon which to do so. If nothing is true, then all is spectacle. The biggest wallet pays for the most blinding lights.


9. Investigate. Figure things out for yourself. Spend more time with long articles. Subsidize investigative journalism by subscribing to print media. Realize that some of what is on your screen is there to harm you. Learn about sites that investigate foreign propaganda pushes.


10. Practice corporeal politics. Power wants your body softening in your chair and your emotions dissipating on the screen. Get outside. Put your body in unfamiliar places with unfamiliar people. Make new friends and march with them.
 


11. Make eye contact and small talk. This is not just polite. It is a way to stay in touch with your surroundings, break down unnecessary social barriers, and come to understand whom you should and should not trust. If we enter a culture of denunciation, you will want to know the psychological landscape of your daily life.


12. Take responsibility for the face of the world. Notice the swastikas and the other signs of hate. Do not look away and do not get used to them. Remove them yourself and set an example for others to do so.
 


13. Hinder the one-party state. The parties that took over states were once something else. They exploited a historical moment to make political life impossible for their rivals. Vote in local and state elections while you can.
 


14. Give regularly to good causes, if you can. Pick a charity and set up autopay. Then you will know that you have made a free choice that is supporting civil society helping others doing something good.
 


15. Establish a private life. Nastier rulers will use what they know about you to push you around. Scrub your computer of malware. Remember that email is skywriting. Consider using alternative forms of the internet, or simply using it less. Have personal exchanges in person. For the same reason, resolve any legal trouble. Authoritarianism works as a blackmail state, looking for the hook on which to hang you. Try not to have too many hooks.


16. Learn from others in other countries. Keep up your friendships abroad, or make new friends abroad. The present difficulties here are an element of a general trend. And no country is going to find a solution by itself. Make sure you and your family have passports.
 


17. Watch out for the paramilitaries. When the men with guns who have always claimed to be against the system start wearing uniforms and marching around with torches and pictures of a Leader, the end is nigh. When the pro-Leader paramilitary and the official police and military intermingle, the game is over.


18. Be reflective if you must be armed. If you carry a weapon in public service, God bless you and keep you. But know that evils of the past involved policemen and soldiers finding themselves, one day, doing irregular things. Be ready to say no. (If you do not know what this means, contact the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum and ask about training in professional ethics.)
 


19. Be as courageous as you can. If none of us is prepared to die for freedom, then all of us will die in unfreedom.


20. Be a patriot. The incoming president is not. Set a good example of what America means for the generations to come. They will need it.

--Timothy Snyder, Housum Professor of History, Yale University, 
15 November 2016.

---
(PS: If this is useful to you, please print it out and pass it around!
1 December 2016)
(PPS: I removed a reference to a website, which as friends have pointed out is too context-specific for what has become a public and widely-read list. 2 December 2016)