|
INNOVATION |
TIVITY |
|
ABILITY |
BILITY |
TIME TO
BENEFIT |
|
TECHNICAL
SOCIAL FEASIBILITY |
PRIORITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KEY
|
|
UNKNOWN |
|
|
NEGATIVE IMPACT |
|
|
NO IMPACT |
|
|
POSITIVE IMPACT |
|
|
VERY POSITIVE IMPACT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Environment Secretariate, Clark University, Egerton
University, and World Resources Institute (1991) Participatory Rural
Appraisal Handbook, Worcester, MA: National Environment Secretariate,
Clark University, Egerton University and World Resources Institute.