Kate Alexander
The Campbell Assignment
America of the 1840s will provide the timeframe for an assignment in rhetoric
to be completed by university students. Historical events and philosophy of the
time include the overreaching concept of “manifest destiny,” an idea originally
espoused by Jacksonian followers, but embraced by William Henry Harrison and
his successor, John Tyler. Americans believe that the God of Christianity
supports their movement westward. This colonialist movement, unfortunately, has
no consideration for the Native American’s already occupying the land. The
annexation of Texas sparks the Mexican American war. Lucretia Mott and
Elizabeth Cady Stanton organize the first American women’s rights convention in
Seneca Falls, New York. Harriet Tubman escapes to the North and begins
working with Underground Railroad. In the meantime, Ralph Waldo Emerson
publishes his essays including “Self-Reliance,” Frederick Douglas begins
publishing, and Henry David Thoreau publishes his “Resistance to Civil
Government.” The 40s are thus a time of vibrant philosophical thoughts, many of
which are at odds with each other. Anticipation of the future and a new hope
for rights of all are in the air. At the antislavery convention in London, William Henry Harrison and others walk out when women abolitionists are not
allowed to be seated as delegates. The Amistad mutineers are allowed to return
to Africa.
The students who are to complete the assignment will be situated at Oberlin College in Ohio. This college is significant because of its early acceptance of African
American students and its support of the abolitionist movement. This college is
also significant because it produced the first four women in the nation to
receive the four-year degree. Among these graduates were Lucy Stone (1847), one
of the first women to keep her own name after marriage, and Antoinette Brown
Blackwell (1847). Of note is the enrollment of Margru, known as Sarah Kinson,
former Amistad captive, who returns to the United States to take classes at
Oberlin (1846-1848) (http://www.oberlinheritage.org/timeline2.html). Although
many African American women attend Oberlin, Mary Jane Patterson is the first to
receive the A.B. degree in 1862
(http://www.oberlin.edu/archive/holdings/finding/RG5’SG4/S3/catalogue).
A search of the Oberlin Archives produced a catalogue listing trustees,
faculty, students, and curriculum of the time. The junior class curriculum
includes Olmsted’s Natural Philosophy, Herschel’s Astronomy, Chemistry,
Physiology and Anatomy resume and extended, Cicero’s De officiis, Greek
Testament, Epistles reviewed, Plato’s Phaedo, Hebrew Bible, Isaiah and other
prophets, Milton’s poems, lectures on law, political economy, Erskine’s
Internal Evidences, and Leslie on Deism, Stewart’s Elements of Intellectual
Philosophy, Demosthenes’ Oration on the Crown, and, of particular important to
this assignment, Campbell’s Philosophy of Rhetoric. The sophomore curriculum
includes the study of Whately’s Logic and Rhetoric. Although the female
students have a female principal, Mrs. Alice W. Cowles, they study rhetoric
with James Dascomb, M.D. who teaches chemistry, mathematics and natural
philosophy, law, sacred music, and rhetoric. The size of the junior female
class is about 36 students. The ratio of men to women at Oberlin in 1836 is 92
to 310. The male students need to present evidence of good moral character, and
those studying theology need to bring certificates of good standing in an
evangelical church. The female students have to present evidence of character
and usefulness and their ability to perform domestic labor, along their
intention to pursue a program of study for at least two years. Men and women
are separated in classes except in cases where course availability is limited.
In this case, classes are coeducational.
The Assignment
This assignment will span a month’s time with different assignments due each
week.
Weeks One and Two: Students will read Book I of Campbell’s The Philosophy of
Rhetoric and will be prepared to recite primary ideas expressed by Campbell
during the first week. During the second week, students will be examined on the
ideas gleaned from the readings and recitations of the first week. In summary,
this is what the young ladies will be expected to know:
• Campbell calls upon the treatise of his fellow Scotsman, David Hume (A
Treatise of Human Nature), to formulate his own philosophy of rhetoric. Both
Hume and Campbell are phenomenologists or empiricists, that is to say, they
rely upon experience for their view of reality. This is contra Immanuel Kant
who, in very simple terms, proposed that phenomena received through the senses
provide means to the noumena, a state attainable by reason.
• Definition of Rhetoric
o That talent by which the discourse if adapted to its end
o The grand art of communication, not of ideas only, but of sentiments,
passions, dispositions, and purposes
o The art of speaking, in the extensive sense in which Campbell employs the
term (this will be answered in the reading)
• Stages of Rhetoric as follows:
o First and primitive stage consists of what an individual derives from an
awareness of what operates on his own mind, aided by sympathetic feelings
derived from experience.
o Second stage distinguishes between types of discourse and arguments. The idea
of logic and the syllogism enter the rhetorical picture.
o Third stage involves the perfection of this “science” by scientific
investigation of the experiential element.
o Philosophy of rhetoric becomes the fourth stage.
• Theory of Human Nature:
o Mental contents: These are entities that we cannot question because they are
immediately present to the mind.
§ The first of these are sensations
because they reveal internal sensations such as pleasures and pains or
qualities such as color and figure derived from external objects. All
perceptions, Campbell posits, originate in sensations, thus again classifying
him as a phenomenologist or empiricist.
Ideas of memory derive also from sensations as they are prints left by
sensible impressions§
§ The third component of Campbell’s “mental contents” is imagination which derives from memory and thus from
sensation. Included here are ideas of golden cities and centaurs, unreal things
never observed
o Vivacity—Campbell believes that mind distinguishes between kinds of
perception by relative degrees of vivacity, a concept which includes
liveliness, force, energy brightness, brilliancy, steadiness and luster.
o Association of Ideas—The most important associations are resemblance,
contiguity, and causation. The mind associates ideas which are similar,
contiguous in space and time, and ideas related as to causes and effects.
o Experience and Method—Causation is the most important since this is the basis
of everything we know by inference about real existence. Campbell believes that
the purpose of the syllogism (Barbara, particularly) is to clarify language and
to be applied to mathematics and geometry. He also finds fault with the
rationalist method of strict demonstration. In accordance with the teachings of
Hume, Campbell then makes experience and the form of moral reasoning based upon
it as the fundamental method of inquiry and proof.
o Other elements in the Campbell’s philosophy include sympathy because it is
the method by which passion is transferred from one person to another. It
attaches us to the concerns of others.
In summary, students should know:
• The vivacity or liveliness of ideas-the quality primarily responsible for
attention and belief
• Of the kinds of perceptions, sensations are typically the most vivid, ideas
of memory are less vivid, and ideas of the imagination are the least vivid.
• There is an attraction or association among the ideas of the mind
Week Three: The male professor of rhetoric will ask the female students to
consider the 1832 Lecture at Franklin Hall of Maria Stewart with particular
consideration of the following passages:
“Why sit ye here and die? If we say we will go to a foreign land, the famine
and the pestilence are there, and there we shall die. If we sit here, we shall
die. Come let us plead our cause before the whites: if they save us alive, we
shall live—and if they kill us, we shall but die.
Methinks I heard a spiritual interrogation—'Who shall go forward, and take off
the reproach that is cast upon the people of color? Shall it be a woman? And my
heart made this reply —'If it is thy will, be it even so, Lord Jesus!'
I have heard much respecting the horrors of slavery; but may Heaven forbid that
the generality of my color throughout these United States should experience any
more of its horrors than to be a servant of servants, or hewers of wood and
drawers of water! Tell us no more of southern slavery; for with few exceptions,
although I may be very erroneous in my opinion, yet I consider our condition
but little better than that. Yet, after all, methinks there are no chains so
galling as the chains of ignorance—no fetters so binding as those that bind the
soul, and exclude it from the vast field of useful and scientific knowledge. O,
had I received the advantages of early education, my ideas would, ere now, have
expanded far and wide; but, alas! I possess nothing but moral capability—no
teachings but the teachings of the Holy spirit (sic).
I have asked several individuals of my sex, who transact business for
themselves, if providing our girls were to give them the most satisfactory
references, they would not be willing to grant them an equal opportunity with
others? Their reply has been—for their own part, they had no objection; but as
it was not the custom, were they to take them into their employ, they would be
in danger of losing the public patronage. And such is the powerful force of
prejudice. Let our girls possess what amiable qualities of soul they may; let
their characters be fair and spotless as innocence itself; let their natural
taste and ingenuity be what they may; it is impossible for scarce an individual
of them to rise above the condition of servants. Ah! why is this cruel and
unfeeling distinction? Is it merely because God has made our complexion to
vary? If it be, O shame to soft, relenting humanity! "Tell it not in Gath! publish it not in the streets of Askelon!" Yet, after all, methinks were the
American free people of color to turn their attention more assiduously to moral
worth and intellectual improvement, this would be the result: prejudice would
gradually diminish, and the whites would be compelled to say, unloose those
fetters!
Though black their skins as shades of night, Their hearts are pure, their souls
are white.”
--In With Pen and Voice. Ed. Shirley Wilson Logan,
Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois U. Press, 1995.
Students will apply Campbell’s rhetorical terms and philosophy to the speech.
They will begin by identifying passages of vivacity or liveliness of ideas. For
example:
o Maria Stewart juxtaposes life and death against the ideas of action and
inaction as she employs the rhetorical device of antithesis in a Ciceronian
sense as found in his Tusculan Disputations. In other words, we can look life
in the eye and confront the issues or we can simply die. Stewart thus
challenges her audience to become active.
o She next invokes God’s selection of her as a woman to carry the torch under
the protection of the Holy Spirit
Students will be required to identify two additional examples of vivacity in
the passages from Maria Stewart’s speech.
Each student will then recite the speech before the class.
Next, students will consider perception in terms of sensations they are experiencing
while reading and delivering the speech. These might include thoughts about
death, thoughts about God, and thoughts about injustices done to those in
slavery. Then, students will consider impressions left following initial
reading of the Stewart passages. In an invocation of memory, students will be
asked if the speech brought up any impressions previous to their reading it?
The next part involves imagination for those students not directly involved in
the ravages of slavery who have only read about it. This group will be asked to
write about these impressions. Those from the African American population will
write as well. However, their writing will most surely be based on direct
experience. I want all students to look particularly at the last line of the
passage which presents today as very controversial, but not terribly unusual at
the time. William Blake has a similar statement in his poem, “The Little Black
Boy” (Songs of Innocence): “Though black their skins as shades of night, Their
hearts are pure, their souls are white.”
All students will then read their essays in class.
Week Four: Students will read the following passages from a speech delivered by
Frederick Douglas at the Plymouth County Anti-Slavery Society, November 4,
1841):
THE CHURCH AND PREJUDICE : “At the South I was a member of the Methodist Church. When I came north, I thought one Sunday I would attend communion, at one
of the churches of my denomination, in the town I was staying. The white people
gathered round the altar, the blacks clustered by the door. After the good
minister had served out the bread and wine to one portion of those near him, he
said, "These may withdraw, and others come forward;" thus he
proceeded till all the white members had been served. Then he took a long
breath, and looking out towards the door, exclaimed, "Come up, colored
friends, come up! for you know God is no respecter of persons!" I haven't
been there to see the sacraments taken since.”
“The slaveholding ministers preach up the divine right of the slaveholders to
property in their fellow- men. The southern preachers say to the poor slave,
"Oh! if you wish to be happy in time, happy in eternity, you must be
obedient to your masters; their interest is yours. God made one portion of men
to do the working, and another to do the thinking; how good God is! Now, you
have no trouble or anxiety; but ah! you can't imagine how perplexing it is to
your masters and mistresses to have so much thinking to do in your behalf! You
cannot appreciate your blessings; you know not how happy a thing it is for you,
that you were born of that portion of the human family which has the working,
instead of the thinking to do! Oh! how grateful and obedient you ought to be to
your masters! How beautiful are the arrangements of Providence! Look at your
hard, horny hands--see how nicely they are adapted to the labor you have to
perform! Look at our delicate fingers, so exactly fitted for our station, and
see how manifest it is that God designed us to be His thinkers, and you the
workers--Oh! the wisdom of God!"--I used to attend a Methodist church, in
which my master was a class leader; he would talk most sanctimoniously about
the dear Redeemer, who was sent "to preach deliverance to the captives,
and set at liberty them that are bruised"--he could pray at morning, pray
at noon, and pray at night; yet he could lash up my poor cousin by his two
thumbs, and inflict stripes and blows upon his bare back, till the blood
streamed to the ground! all the time quoting scripture, for his authority, and
appealing to that passage of the Holy Bible which says, "He that knoweth
his master's will, and doeth it not, shall be beaten with many stripes!"
Such was the amount of this good Methodist's piety.
Students will consider this speech with special emphasis on Campbell’s
categories of cause and effect as well as sympathy and write a two-page essay
delineating their responses. They may also call upon any material used in their
analysis of the Stewart speech. They will read their essays before the class.