January 29 Assignment
Reading:
- Donna Haraway’s “Manifesto for Cyborgs.” This is one of those classic, must-read
pieces. In addition, we may find it useful for conceptualizing the self in
relation to media—part of our teasing out the ideologies of literacy
project. http://www.stanford.edu/dept/HPS/Haraway/CyborgManifesto.html
- Gunther Kress and Theo van Leeuwen. Excerpts from
Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (ereserves). Kress is the guru of visual theorizing.
He recycles his material frequently—so you’ll find him using the same
examples and making the same points in various publications. Nonetheless—I
am never disappointed in reading his work. Decide whether you want to do more with visual
literacy and let me know. Kress and
Leeuwen will talk about the “semiotic landscape.”
- Linda
Brodkey. Excerpts from Writing in Designated Areas Only. Brodkey theorizes
the autoethnography and so try to locate her definition and think about it
in relation to the literacy narrative—as exemplified in Pandey’s article—and
in relation to Pratt’s classic piece on the autoethnography. *** We’ll come back to the issue of how
the pieces of Pratt’s essay hang together: she uses the anecdote of her
son’s baseball card hobby to define “cultural ecology of literacy”—yes? In
other words, reading and writing do not take place in vacuum. Not only
does she argue by this anecdote that literacy is a situated activity and
that writing or visuals “mean” in relation to other phenomena, she appears
to argue that cultural ecologies are always in flux, always shifting
shape. And then there’s the
question of how Poma and baseball cards co-exist in the same article—we’ll
return to this point.
There are a
bunch of Brodkey excerpts on ereserves. Read the following:
a) Part
I Writing Permitted, which begins “Introduction to Part I: and is followed by
her autoethnography “Writing on the Bias.”
b) Tropics,
Writing Permitted. In the last section on writing critical ethnographic
narratives, we’ll locate how she adapts Pratt’s concept—so work on this section
carefully in conjunction with “Writing on the Bias.” ** I think the Critical Ethnography pages are
also posted separately.
Writing:
How about a blog entry for each author (reading). Instead of rehearsing what you read, please
pose a question you’d like to discuss in class—but have several subset
questions that go with it. Our practical aim is to develop a sense of what you’re
going to write that counts as an “autoethnography” as we collectively come to
understand the possibilities of this genre. But we can take many intellectual
detours along the way to this practical goal.
Other
- Be
thinking about writing spaces that might house your autoethnography, which
I’ll probably want to be multimodal; think about the RELATIONSHIP of the
different modes and the different literacy features we listed on the board.
- Continue
with myspace experiments and observations. Keep
this site stress free as much as possible. We’ll create stress in other
environments.