Social Cheating and Cancer

Using simulation and analytical theory borrowed from statistical mechanics, we
find that simple community structure can be surprisingly effective at maintaining
cooperation, despite a relatively large influx of heritable cheating (by any
mechanism, such as mutation, transformation, or migration). When this influx
exceeds a marked threshold, however, cooperation is lost. Our findings are of
general interest across a wide range of biological and social sciences, and our
framework may provide a parsimonious model of somatic evolutionary processes
leading up to the transition from normal to cancerous tissue.

A large body of previous work has focused on the evolution of cooperation rather
than its maintenance and, while superficially similar, these two problems require
very different approaches. In a population of defectors, the appearance of a
cooperator would be quite a novel – even anomalous – innovation, and previous
work has therefore asked whether a single cooperating mutant introduced into a
population of defectors is likely to reach fixation. In a population of cooperators,
however, defectors (or “cheaters”) can arise by loss‐of‐function mutations (or
transformations) and can therefore appear quite frequently. It is thus more
accurate to model the appearance of cheaters in a population of cooperators as
recurring throughout the population at some rate of influx. As a result, the
problem of cooperation maintenance is quite different than problems previously
addressed, and yet its relevance to biology and the social sciences is self‐evident.

In review.

Background:

  • Anderson GR, Stoler DL, Brenner BM (2001) Cancer: the evolved consequence of a destabilized genome. Bioessays 23: 1037-1046
  • Axelrod R, Hamilton WD (1981) The evolution of cooperation. Science 211: 1390-1396
  • Baalen V (2000) Pair approximations for different spatial geometries. In: Dieckmann U, Law R, Metz JAJ, editors. The Geometry of Ecological Interactions: Simplifying Spatial Complexity: Cambridge University Press. pp. 359-387
  • Hanahan D, Weinberg RA (2000) The Hallmarks of Cancer. Cell 100: 57-70
  • Matsuda H, Ogita N, Sasaki A, Sato K (1992) Statistical mechanics of population: the lattice Lotka-Volterra model. Prog Theor Phys 88: 1035-1049
  • Nowak MA (2006) Five Rules for the Evolution of Cooperation. Science 314: 1560-1563
  • Ohtsuki H, Hauert C, Lieberman E, Nowak MA (2006) A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks. Nature 441: 502-505
  • Velicer GJ, Kroos L, Lenski RE (1998) Loss of social behaviors by Myxococcus xanthus during evolution in an unstructured habitat. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 12376-12380
  • Velicer GJ, Kroos L, Lenski RE (2000) Developmental cheating in the social bacterium Myxococcus xanthus. Nature 404: 598-601