Current Teaching Links:
Recent Class Links:
My Page of Quotations
On Decisions and Strategy
What would be the point of ciphering messages that very clever enemies couldn't break? You'd end up not knowing what they thought you thought they were thinking...
Treason can help our enemies destroy our country by making them stronger; adventurism can destroy our country by making our enemies more numerous.
The decisions a general has to make would furnish a problem of mathematical calculations not unworthy of the powers of a Newton or an Euler.
Success in war is obtained by anticipating the plans of the enemy, and by diverting his attention from our own designs.
Grand strategy must always remember that peace follows war.
On Liberty and War
I am not frightened at the word rebellion. I do not scruple to say that I have sympathized more or less ardently with most of the rebellions, successful and unsuccessful, which have taken place in my time. But I certainly never conceived that there was a sufficient title to my sympathy in the mere fact of being a rebel; that the act of taking arms against one's fellow-citizens was so meritorious in itself, was so completely its own justification, that no question need be asked concerning the motive.
Secession may be laudable, and so may any other kind of insurrection; but it may also be an enormous crime.
War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things: the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks nothing worth a war, is worse.
A man who has nothing which he is willing to fight for, nothing which he cares more about than he does about his personal safety, is a miserable creature, who has no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. As long as justice and injustice have not terminated their ever renewing fight for ascendancy in the affairs of mankind, human beings must be willing, when need is, to do battle for the one against the other.
The great aim of the struggle for liberty has been equality before the law.
On Theory and Modeling
There is no question of your working out the entire future of the Glactic Emprie, you know. You needn't trace out in detail the workings of every human being or even every world. There are merely certain questions you must answer: Will the Glactic Empire crash and, if so, when? What will be the condition of humanity afterward? Can anything be done to prevent the crash or ameliorate conditions afterward? These are comparatively simple questions, it seems to me.
A "theory" that cannot be arrow-diagrammed is not a theory...
Theory is the poetry of science. It is simplification, the essential abstraction, the exaggeration of truth. Through simplification theory creates a caricature of reality. Through deduction the premises of the caricature are translated into empirical--and therefore refutable--generalizations. The caricature itself is not the real world--it mocks it. Yet mind true things by their mockeries! The caricature mocks reality; the deductions from the caricature illuminate it.
The single most important decision in modeling is the design of the game.
The art of modeling resides in the ability to sense what is of primary importance, as distinguished from what is of only secondary consequence. It relies on the selection of details for inclusion or exclusion in a simplified representation of reality. The science of modeling depends on the ability to extract testable, falsifiable relationships among variables that follow in a logically coherent fashion, so that the connection between the model's structure and its empirical implications is clear and consistent.
Anything else we can find that is described by the model will behave as the model behaves.
As we add dimensions [complexity] to the model, and the model becomes more particular, we can be less confident that our model is of something we shall ever want to examine. And after a certain amount of heuristic experiments with building blocks, it becomes more productive to identify the actual characteristics of the phenomena we want to study, rather than to explore general properties....
To go further and explain more of the behaviors seen in experiments such as these, some economists have made strong and not too realistic assumptions and then churned out the observed behavior from complicated models. I do not believe that we learn much from this approach. As these models and assumptions become more convoluted to fit the data, they provide less and less insight.
But the parties in a protracted civil war almost invariably end by taking more extreme, not to say higher grounds of principle, than they began with. Middle parties and friends of compromise are soon left behind;...
A good part of social organization--of what we call society--consists of institutional arrangements to overcome these divergences between perceived individual interest and some larger collective bargain.
The art of progress is to preserve order amid change, and to preserve change amid order. Life refuses to be embalmed alive. The more prolonged the halt in some unrelieved system of order, the greater the crash of the dead society.
There's only one force tougher to manage than plasma: politics.
On Philosophy of Science
Science is facts; just as houses are made of stone, so is science made of facts; but a pile of stones is not a house, and a collection of facts is not necessarily science.
...Science walks forward on two feet, namely theory and experiment.... Sometimes it is one foot which is put forward first, sometimes the other, but continuous progress is only made by the use of both - by theorizing and then testing, or by finding new relations in the process of experimenting and then bringing the theoretical foot up and pushing it on beyond, and so on in unending alternations.
Bias cannot be equated with the existence of a preference; rather, bias should be defined as our unwillingness to abandon these preferences (or at least to challenge them further and rigorously) when nature seems to say "no" to our explicit searches and tests.
The pilgrim fathers of the scientific imagination as it exists today are the great tragedians of ancient Athens, Aeschylus, Sophocles, Euripides. Their vision of fate, remorseless and indifferent, urging a tragic incident to its inevitable issue, is the vision, possessed by science. Fate in Greek Tragedy becomes the order of nature in modern thought.
The results of science are never quite true. By a healthy independence of thought [perhaps] we sometimes avoid adding other people's errors to our own.
There can be no true physical science which looks first to mathematics for the provision of a conceptual model. Such a procedure is to repeat the errors of the logicians of the middle ages.
On Academic Writing
Unfortunately, too much of modern science, although now so long, and so clearly, beyond any need thus to mark its territory of distinction from humanistic study, has retained and intensified this attitude into an active distaste for stylistic felicity in writing---as if the factual content of a work becomes debased if an author also possesses a fortunate talent for decent prose.
Tables, graphs, diagrams, and displayed equations should elucidate the argument, not obscure it.
This page last modified 01/17/12.
This page has been accessed 153323 times.