|
|
|
Publications |
|
Copyright Notice: The publishers hold the copyright of these articles. The PDFs are provided here to ensure rapid dissemination of scholarly work. It is understood that you will use them only in a manner consistent with the fair use provisions of U.S. copyright law. You may not distribute them or use them for any commercial enterprise. Ruthruff, E. & Gaspelin, N. (in press). Immunity to attentional
capture at ignored locations. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics. Maquestiaux, F., Ruthruff, E., Defer, A., Ibrahime, S. (in press). Dual-Task
Automatization: The Key Role of Sensory-Motor Modality Compatibility. Attention, Perception, and
Psychophysics. Jung, K., Ruthruff, E., & Goldsmith, T. (2017). Document Similarity
Misjudgment by LSA: Misses vs. False Positives. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society. Ruthruff, E., & Lien, M.-C. (2017). Aging and Attention. Encyclopedia of Gerontology.
doi:10.1007/978-981-287-080-3_227-1. [pdf] Keller, J., Ruthruff, E., Keller, P.S. (2017). Mindfulness and
divergent thinking: The value of heart rate variability as an objective
manipulation check. Universal Journal
of Psychology, 5(3), 95-104. doi: 10.13189/ujp.2017.050301 Keller, J., Gaspelin, N., & Ruthruff, E. (2017) Your brain becomes
a rainbow: Perceptions and traits of fourth graders in a school-based
mindfulness intervention. Childhood
Education, 31, 508-529. Arexis, M., Maquestiaux, F., Gaspelin, N., Ruthruff, E., &
Didierjean, A. (2016). Attentional Capture in Driving Displays. British Journal of Psychology. DOI:
10.1111/bjop.12197 Gaspelin, N., Ruthruff, E., & Lien, M.-C. (2016). The Problem of
Latent Attentional Capture: Easy Visual Search Conceals Capture by
Task-Irrelevant Abrupt Onsets. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42,
1104-1120. [pdf]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000214 Johnston, J. C., Ruthruff, E., and Lien, M.-C. (2016). Visual
information processing from multiple displays. Human Factors. [pdf] Gaspelin, N., Margett-Jordan, T., & Ruthruff, E. (2015). Susceptible
to distraction: Children lack top-down control over spatial attention
capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 461-468. Gaspelin, N., Ruthruff, E., & Jung, K. (2014). Slippage theory and
the flanker paradigm: An early-selection account of selective attention
failures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1257-1273. [download color
figures] Noosen, B., Lien, M.-C., and Ruthruff, E. (2014). An electrophysiological study of attention
capture by salience: Does rarity enable capture? Journal of Cognitive
Psychology, 3, 346-371. Lien, M.-C., Taylor, R.; Ruthruff, E. (2014). Capture by fear
revisited: An electrophysiological investigation. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 873-888. Lien, M.C.; Ruthruff, E.; Naylor, J. (2014). Attention capture while
switching search strategies: Evidence for a breakdown in top-down attentional
Control, Visual Cognition, 22, 1105-1133. Allen, P. A., Lien, M.-C., Ruthruff, E. & Voss, A. (2014).
Multi-tasking and aging: Do older adults benefit from performing a highly
practiced task? Experimental Aging
Research, 40, 280-307. Didierjean, A., Maquestiaux, F., Vieillard, S., Ruthruff, E., & Hartley, A. A. (2014).
Sexual distractors boost younger and older adults' visual search RSVP
Performance. British Journal of
Psychology, 105,162-172. Jung, K., Ruthruff, E., &
Gaspelin, N. (2013). Automatic identification of familiar faces. Attention,
Perception, and Psychophysics, 7, 438-1450. Maquestiaux, F., Didierjean,
A., Ruthruff, E., Chauvel, G., & Hartley, A. A. (2013). Lost ability to automatize task performance
in old age. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 1206-1212. Maquestiaux, F., Ruthruff, E.,
Didierjean, A., & Hartley, A. A. (2013). Novice motor performance: Better
not verbalize. Psychonomic Bulletin
& Review, 201, 177-183. Gaspelin, N., Ruthruff, E.,
& Pashler, H. (2013). Divided attention: An undesirable difficulty in
memory retention. Memory &
Cognition, 41, 978-988. [pdf] Gaspelin, N., Ruthruff, E., Lien, M.-C., & Jung, K. (2012). Breaking through the
attentional window: Capture by abrupt onsets versus color singletons. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics,
74, 1461-1474. [download
color figures] [pdf] Gaspelin, N., Ruthruff, E.,
Jung, K., Cosman, J. D., & Vecera,
S. P. (2012). Does low perceptual load enable capture by color singletons? Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24, 735-750.
[pdf] Jung, K., Ruthruff, E.,
Tybur, J., Gaspelin, N., & Miller, G. (2012). Perception of facial
attractiveness requires some attentional resources: Implications for the
“automaticity” of psychological adaptations.
Evolution and Human Behavior,
33, 241-250. Allen, P. A., Lien, M.-C., & Ruthruff, E. (2011). Cognition and emotion: Neuroscience and
behavioural perspectives. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23,
667-668. Shaw, K., Lien, M. C.,
Ruthruff, E., & Allen, P. A. (2011). Electrophysiological Evidence of
Emotion Perception without Central Attention. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 695-708. Allen, P. A., Kaut, K., Baena, E., Lien, M.
C., & Ruthruff, E. (2011). Individual differences in positive affect
moderate age-related declines in episodic long-term Memory. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23,
768-779. Green, C., Johnston, J. C., &
Ruthruff, E. (2011). Attentional limits in memory retrieval – revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
Perception and Performance, 37, 1083-1098. Lien, M.-C., Gemperle, A., & Ruthruff, E. (2011).
Aging and Involuntary Attention Capture: Electrophysiological Evidence for
Preserved Attentional Control with Advanced Age. Psychology and Aging, 26,
188-202. Ruthruff, E., & Pashler, H. (2010). Mental timing
and the central attentional bottleneck. In A. C. Nobre & J. T. Coull
(Eds.) Attention and Time (pp.
123-135). Oxford University Press. Lien, M.-C., Ruthruff, E., & Johnston, J. C.
(2010). Attention capture with rapidly
changing attentional control settings.
Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1-16. Lien, M.-C., Ruthruff, E., Kouchi, S., & Lachter,
J. (2010). Elevating Baseline Activation does not Facilitate Reading of
Unattended Words. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72, 973-988. Maquestiaux, F., Laguë-Beauvais,
M., Ruthruff, E., Hartley, A., & Bherer, L.
(2010). Learning to bypass the central bottleneck: Declining automaticity
with advancing age. Psychology and
Aging, 25, 177-192. Lien, M.-C., Ruthruff, E., & Cornett, L. (2010).
Attentional capture by singletons is contingent on top-down control settings:
Evidence from electrophysiological measures.
Visual Cognition, 18,
682-727. Lachter, J., Remington, R. W., & Ruthruff, E.
(2009). The nature of dimensional selection. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 71, 995-1014. Tomasik, D., Ruthruff, E.,
Allen, P. A., & Lien, M.-C. (2009). Non-automatic emotion perception in a
dual-task situation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16,
282-288. Ruthruff, E., Johnston, J. C., & Remington, R. W.
(2009). How strategic is the central bottleneck: Can it be overcome by trying
harder? Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1368-1384. Allen, P. A., Ruthruff, E., Elicker, J. D., & Lien,
M.-C. (2009). Multi-session, dual-task PRP practice benefits older and
younger adults equally. Experimental
Aging Research, 35, 369-399. Lien, M.-C., Ruthruff, E. (2008). Inhibition of task
set: Converging evidence from task choice in the voluntary task-switching
paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin &
Review, 15, 950-955. [pdf] Lachter, J., Ruthruff, E., Lien, M.-C., & McCann,
R. S. (2008). Is attention needed for
object identification? Evidence from the Stroop paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,
15, 1110-1116. [pdf] Maquestiaux, F., Laguë-Beauvais, M., Ruthruff, E.,
& Bherer, L. (2008) Bypassing the central bottleneck after single-task
practice in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Evidence for task
automatization and greedy resource recruitment. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1262-1282. [pdf] Lien, M.-C., Ruthruff, E., Cornett, L., Goodin, Z., & Allen, P. A.
(2008). On the non-automaticity of visual word processing:
Electrophysiological evidence that word processing requires central
attention. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 751-773. Lien, M.-C., Ruthruff, E., & Kuhns, D. (2008). Age-related
differences in switching between cognitive tasks: Does internal control
ability decline with age? Psychology
and Aging, 23, 330-341. [pdf] Lien, M.-C., Ruthruff, E., Goodin, Z., & Remington,
R. W. (2008). Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings:
Converging evidence from event-related potentials. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34,
509-530. [pdf] Ruthruff, E., Allen, P. A., Lien, M.-C., & Grabbe,
J. (2008). Visual word recognition without central attention: Evidence for
greater automaticity with greater reading ability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 337-343. [pdf] Kuhns, D., Lien, M.-C., & Ruthruff, E. (2007).
Proactive versus reactive task-set inhibition in task switching: Evidence
from flanker compatibility effects. Psychonomic
Bulletin & Review, 14, 977-983. Lien, M.-C., Ruthruff, E., Hsieh, S.-L., & Yu,
Y.-T. (2007).
Parallel central processing between tasks: Evidence from
lateralized readiness potentials. Psychonomic
Bulletin & Review, 14, 133-141. Green, C., Johnston, J. C., & Ruthruff, E. (2007).
Recognition of pictures may not require central attentional resources. Proceedings
of the Cognitive Science Society. Allen, P. A., Ruthruff, E, & Lien, M.-C. (2007). Attention. In J. Birren (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Gerontology. Lien, M.-C., Allen, P.
A., Ruthruff, E., Grabbe, J., McCann, R. S., & Remington, R. W.
(2006). Visual word recognition without
central attention: Evidence for greater automaticity with advancing age. Psychology
and Aging, 21, 431-447. Hazeltine, E., & Ruthruff, E. (2006). Modality pairing effects and the response selection bottleneck. Psychological Research, 70, 504-513. Ruthruff, E., Hazeltine, E., & Remington, R. W. (2006). What causes residual dual-task cost after practice? Psychological Research, 70, 494-503. Hazeltine, E., Ruthruff, E., & Remington, R. W. (2006). The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: Evidence for content-dependent central interference. Cognitive Psychology, 52, 291-345. [pdf] Lien, M.-C., Ruthruff, E., & Johnston, J. C. (2006). Attentional limitations in doing two things at once: The search for exceptions. Current Directions in Psychological Science. [pdf] Lien, M., Ruthruff, E., & Kuhns, D. (2006). On the difficulty of task switching: Assessing the role of task-set inhibition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 53-535. [pdf] Ruthruff, E., Van Selst, M., Johnston, J. C., & Remington, R. W. (2006). How does practice reduce dual-task interference: Integration, automatization, or simply stage-shortening? Psychological Research, 70, 125-142. [pdf] Bucur, B., Allen, P. A., Sanders, R. E., Ruthruff, E., & Murphy, M. (2005). Redundancy Gain and Coactivation in Bimodal Detection: Evidence for the Preservation of Coactive Processing in Older Adults. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 60, 279-282. Lien, M.-C., Ruthruff, E., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (2005). On the limits of advance preparation for a task switch: Do people prepare all the task some of the time or some of the task all the time? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 299-315. [pdf] Lien, M.-C., McCann, R. E., Ruthruff, E., & Proctor, R. W. (2005). Confirming and disconfirming theories about ideomotor compatibility in dual-task performance: Reply to Greenwald (2005). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 226-229. [pdf] Lien, M.-C., McCann, R. E., Ruthruff, E., & Proctor, R. W. (2005). Dual-task performance with ideomotor-compatible tasks: Is the central processing bottleneck intact, bypassed, or shifted in locus? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 122-144. [pdf] Lachter, J., Forster, K. I., & Ruthruff, E. (2004). Forty years after Broadbent: Still no identification without attention. Psychological Review, 111, 880-913. [pdf] Lien, M.-C., & Ruthruff, E. (2004). Task switching in a hierarchical task structure: Evidence for the fragility of the task repetition benefit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30, 697-713. [pdf] Lien, M.-C., Proctor, R. W., & Ruthruff, E. (2003). Still no evidence for perfect timesharing with two ideomotor compatible tasks: An observation on Greenwald (2003). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 1267-1272. [pdf] Ruthruff, E., Pashler, H., & Hazeltine, E. (2003). Dual-Task Interference with Equal Task Emphasis: Graded Capacity-Sharing or Central Postponement? Perception and Psychophysics, 65, 801-816. [pdf] Ruthruff, E., Johnston, J. C., Van Selst, M. V., Whitsell, S., & Remington, R. (2003). Vanishing dual-task interference after practice: Has the bottleneck been eliminated or is it merely latent? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 280-289. [pdf] Johnston, J. C., Hochhaus, L., & Ruthruff, E. (2002). Repetition blindness has a perceptual locus: Evidence from online processing of targets in RSVP streams. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 477-489. [pdf] Pashler, H., Johnston, J. C., & Ruthruff, E. (2001). Attention and performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 629-651. [pdf] Ruthruff, E., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (2001). Switching between simple cognitive tasks: The interaction between top-down and bottom-up factors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1404-1419. [pdf] Ruthruff, E., Pashler, H., & Klaassen, A. (2001). Processing bottlenecks in dual-task performance: Structural limitation or voluntary postponement? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 73-80. [pdf] Ruthruff, E., Johnston, J. C., & Van Selst, M. V. (2001). Why practice reduces dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 3-21. [pdf] Ruthruff, E., & Pashler, H. (2001). Central and
peripheral interference in RSVP displays. In K. Shapiro (Ed.), The Limits of Attention: Temporal
Constraints on Human Information Processing, 100-123. Oxford University
Press. [pdf] Remington, R. W., Johnston, J. C., Ruthruff, E., Romera, M., & Gold, M. (2000). Visual search in complex displays: Factors affecting conflict detection by air traffic controllers. Human Factors, 42, 349-366. Van Selst, M. V., Ruthruff, E., & Johnston, J. C. (1999). Can practice eliminate the Psychological Refractory Period effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1268-1283. [pdf] Johnston, J. C., Ruthruff, E., & Monheit, M. (1997). Dependence by any other name smells just as sweet: Reply to van der Velde and van der Heijden. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1813-1818. [pdf] Ruthruff, E. (1996). A test of the Deadline model for speed-accuracy tradeoffs. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 56-64. [pdf] Ruthruff, E., & Miller, J. O. (1995). Negative priming depends on ease of selection. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 715-723. Ruthruff, E., & Miller, J. O. (1995). Can mental rotation begin before perception finishes? Memory & Cognition, 23, 408-424. Ruthruff, E., Miller, J. O., & Lachmann, T. (1995). Does mental rotation require central mechanisms? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 552-570. [pdf] Loftus, G. L., & Ruthruff, E. (1994). A theory of visual
information acquisition and visual memory with special application to
intensity-duration tradeoffs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
Perception and Performance, 20, 33-49. [pdf] Loftus, G. L., Kaufman, L., Nishimoto, T., &
Ruthruff, E. (1992). Why it's annoying to look at slides with the room lights
still on: Effects of visual degradation on perceptual processing and
long-term visual memory. In K. Raynor (Ed.) Eye Movements and Visual Cognition: Scene
Perception and Reading. New York: Springer-Verlag. |